Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
IGI records
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Elizabeth | Report | 21 Apr 2007 09:57 |
Has anyone noticed the following: Sometimes when I search for a family in a parish, I get a list of girls born of that surname and no boys' names. This happened last week - my husbands g-g-g-grandfather wasn't given, nor his brothers, but his sisters were. When I went to the record office (Huntingdon) they were all there. It appears the boys weren't transcribed/entered. Today I'm searching for Kerri - I looked at Bennet(t)s from Bakewell between certain dates. Only girls have come up! I'm sure boys were born between the dates concerned! Has anyone else noticed this or something similar? |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 21 Apr 2007 10:25 |
I've just been searching for a very unusual name - only 33 came up - all in the same area. I looked at a batch number (only 1 came up), then went back to my original search only to find there were only 27 names!!! Where had the other 6 disappeared to???? maggie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 21 Apr 2007 10:25 |
These are known as the J and K series. I used to know the reason for this, but I have forgotten it. It has something to do with how the LDS transcribed various records - you do the boys, I'll do the girls. There are of course, both boys AND girls on the original registers! OC |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 21 Apr 2007 15:02 |
Im just jealous that people find theirs on the IGI - Norfolk wouldnt hand any records over so most of the stuff on their for Norfolk and there is very little, is submitted. |