Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Stoate Marriage

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:02

Yes that is the family but I can't find parents marriage. I have them on the 1841 census

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:03

I am having difficulty in finding the marriage of Thomas Stoate abt1786and Sarah 1781. Whose first child was born in 1813 in Combe florey Somerset.

Penny

Penny Report 2 May 2007 14:04

Which sources have you checked? the IGI? baps for the children 1. MARY ANNE STOATE - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 14 APR 1819 Combe Florey, Somerset, England 2. ELIZA STOATE - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 11 JUN 1815 Combe Florey, Somerset, England 3. JN STAOTE - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 09 NOV 1823 Combe Florey, Somerset, England 4. CHARLOTTE STOATE - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 18 JUL 1813 Combe Florey, Somerset, England

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:05

No I hadn't come across that one. However, I had just begun to wonder if the spelling might have been changed. How can i find out if it is them?

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:06

I have checked Combe florey parish record and IGI

Penny

Penny Report 2 May 2007 14:08

have you eliminated this one? THOMAS STOTT Male Family Birth: Christening: Death: Burial: Marriages: Spouse: SARAH HORSINGTON Family Marriage: 11 NOV 1824 Wookey, Somerset, England

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:10

Thanks Athena, they are on the 1841, but it only gives birthplace as Somerset.

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 2 May 2007 14:12

Linda - they may not have married in Combe Florey. If we assume that they were both born in Somerset then I think you need to widen your search for their marriage. They may have married in another nearby parish - or if they were like my ancestors (who married in Bristol but had their children in London), they may have moved miles away after marrying, so they could have come from any area, really. Were either of them still alive for the 1841 census? If so, what ages and birthplaces are given? Remember also that when searching the IGI and other records, that the surname may not necessarily have been spelt as Stoate - look for variations, such as Stoat and Stott. Best wishes Athena

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:12

Was it common in those days to marry after the birth of children?

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 2 May 2007 14:17

Well, at least we know we are dealing with Somerset people - so with that in mind, further on from that marriage entry that someone found above - this could be the christening entry of the same chap: THOMAS STOTT 06 JAN 1788 Wookey, Somerset, England Father - Matthew Mother - Mary Lyde Regards Athena

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 2 May 2007 14:26

Linda - yes, some people did marry years after having children. By the way, I've just checked the 1841 Census and found your Stoate family - and notice that they have a 3yr old son, Charles - so he was probably born after 1837 when registration first started. Have you tried searching for his birth record yet? If you are lucky enough to find it, the cert will give you his mother's maiden name! Then you will be able to search for a specific marriage using her full name. Athena

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:28

I thought they were too old for him to be a son, rather grandson. What a good idea to look him up, thanks

Linda

Linda Report 2 May 2007 14:30

Nothing doing for Charles anywhere near that date.

♥Athena

♥Athena Report 2 May 2007 14:34

Ooops - no, you're probably right, Linda. Sorry, not concentrating, am I? Not sure if she'd have had a baby in her fifties. Oh pain - just when I thought that was going to be a way through the brick wall for you. Sorry! ps - also just noticed that Charles was not born in that same county. Looks like it says 'I' in the box at the side, doesn't it? Oh well, that's not helping you ...