Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Second pair of eyes needed please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Thelma | Report | 27 May 2007 14:18 |
I agree it is what you want. I must tell you that it would help if you gave year of census. 1901 William Smith Ellen abt 1860 Manchester, Lancashire, England Head North Manchester Lancashire |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 27 May 2007 14:16 |
Hi Jim How are you, long time no speak! Thanks for looking - sorry, I didn't realise I hadn't put the year but then doesn't the RG13 identify it? Lynne |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 27 May 2007 14:09 |
RG13/3759 Folio 77 Page 39 William Smith 1860 Ellen Smith 1880 William H Smith 1882 James Smith 1885 Beatrice Smith 1893 I know for sure that they have Ellen's year of birth wrong as she was born about 1873 so she would be 27 not 21. I think Beatrice is 8 months old, not 8 years. (There is a child lower down the page who is 8 months and it looks the same to me). Thanks in advance. Lynne |
|||
|
Lynne | Report | 27 May 2007 14:09 |
Can someone please check this image for me (See below) |