Second pair of eyes needed please

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	Lynne	Report	27 May 2007 14:09
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	Can someone please check this image for me (See below)
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	Lynne	Report	27 May 2007 14:09
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	RG13/3759 Folio 77 Page 39 William Smith 1860 Ellen Smith 1880 William H Smith 1882 James Smith 1885 Beatrice Smith 1893 I know for sure that they have Ellen's year of birth wrong as she was born about 1873 so she would be 27 not 21. I think Beatrice is 8 months old, not 8 years. (There is a child lower down the page who is 8 months and it looks the same to me). Thanks in advance. Lynne
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	Lynne	Report	27 May 2007 14:16
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 2 483 Send Message	Hi Jim How are you, long time no speak! Thanks for looking - sorry, I didn't realise I hadn't put the year but then doesn't the RG13 identify it? Lynne
Member Since: December 2003 Posts: 7 821 Send Message	Thelma	Report	27 May 2007 14:18
	I agree it is what you want. I must tell you that it would help if you gave year of census. 1901 William Smith Ellen abt 1860 Manchester, Lancashire, England Head North Manchester Lancashire