Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1939 register look up, please.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 10:48 |
Albert Street b15/08/1884 in Bilston, Stafford. He changed his name to Albert Frederick Currell (appears on his marriage certificate). He abandoned his wife and family between 1925 and 1930. In 1933 his wife and son, also Albert Frederick Currell, were living in Regents road, Handsworth in the Midlands. |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 24 Oct 2016 10:59 |
Midlands, England, Electoral Registers, 1832-1955 |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:07 |
Thank you, but this is the son, who has the same name as his father. Four generations had the same name! |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:11 |
Only Rachel and one closed record in 1939 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:16 |
Thank you. Does the closed record read as Albert Currell? Are there any other names on the record? |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:18 |
You can't see a closed record. It means the person is less than 100 years old and still living or they died after 1991. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:21 |
Sorry, did you mean the closed record was at Rachel's address? |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:24 |
There is an Albert Currell b1881...'my' Albert has been proven not to be reliable with his dob. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:31 |
This is the one born 1881 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:33 |
That Albert's occupation on the image is navvy not navy. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:35 |
I don't think this is 'my' Albert. He wasn't in the navy. |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:37 |
Just to eliminate |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:38 |
Nawy...? Not heard of that one. |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:41 |
Thanks, Andrew. The 1909 birth is my grandad who married Doris Evelyn Blower. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:41 |
Navvy as in labourer. I think labourers on the roads and railways were often called navvies. Someone else's may be able to clarify that. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:43 |
Navvy is a labourer, I read it as a w not v v ... :-S |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:51 |
I'll see if I can trace Albert and Catherine, although the liklihood is Albert the deserter didn't marry his new partner, although I won't rule out bigamy! |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 24 Oct 2016 11:57 |
Andrew, I meant to say my Grandad married Doris Blower. I didn't mean the one you found was my grandad. Sorry. That record can be eliminated. |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 24 Oct 2016 12:19 |
On the 1911 census he was a Baker's Assistant - could this be him in 1939. Age completely wrong, but date of birth the same! |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 24 Oct 2016 12:21 |
|