General Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: January 2003 Posts: 184 Send Message	Monica	Report	27 May 2003 23:19
Member Since: January 2003 Posts: 184 Send Message	amanda Spinster "should" mean that the woman had not been married before but nothing is straightfoerward in genealogy. I have an ancestor who on her 2nd marriage cert says Lydia Filler, late Lydia Potter , formerly Lydia Monk- this means her latest husband is Filler, her previous hubby was Potter and her maiden, birth name was Monk. Does this answer your query?

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.