General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1901 Decoder
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rosi | Report | 25 Jun 2003 16:17 |
|
Has this wonderful device now been 'got at' so that it can no longer show us ID Nos. grouped together and lovely useful things like that? Very few, possibly none, of the 75 or so names that were result of a search had consecutive ID Nos. after being processed by the decoder. Seems a bit fishy to me. Rosi Colchester ESS |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 25 Jun 2003 16:42 |
|
Rosi Are you looking at the PAGE IDs or the PERSON IDs? I have just checked my family names in Manchester and they can still be sorted by PERSON ID into consecutive numbers. It is the PAGE IDs that have been got at. Something to do with taking out the Piece and Folio nos, it has effected them. I use the Lancs List DeCoder. Vera, Manchester LAN |
|||
|
Rosi | Report | 25 Jun 2003 22:00 |
|
Thanks Vera, It seems to be the personal ID that's not right - but - maybe there was never a family with more than one Charles Jefferies born in London alive in 1901. I will try agin without the Christian name! Rosi Colchester ESS |
|||