General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Youngest Person on a Census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Suzy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 14:05 |
|
I have just seen an entry on the 1871 census for a baby of 6 hours. (An ancestor of Elaine in Reading, I hasten to add) Has anyone found anyone younger? |
|||
|
Amy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 14:14 |
|
Have someone in my family tree down on census as being 3 days old, but think yours beats that by a mile! Amy x |
|||
|
Suzy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 16:27 |
|
Elaine The youngest child on the 1871 census, called 'Baby'. |
|||
|
McDitzy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 16:36 |
|
I was looking on that.... there's a 'baby' on there, 2 months old... fancy still not having a name then! |
|||
|
Suzy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 17:55 |
|
It does say 'hours' doesn't it? Fantastic. I've got caught out before with the next sheet thing. I've calculated your family had 9 children, although some on the 1871 and 1881 have disappeared by the next census; perhaps they died. |
|||
|
Suzy | Report | 29 Apr 2004 20:42 |
|
I'm not surprised she died young...it's bad enough with 4 kids!! |
|||
|
Bren from Oldham | Report | 29 Apr 2004 22:18 |
|
I noticed a baby who was I day old in the 1841 census for Preston Lancs Bren |
|||