From PICTUREGOER magazine weekending Aug 22 1953

General Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: May 2003 Posts: 9 750 Send Message	ஐ+¨^¨+e+¨^¨+ஐ Mildred Honkinbottom	Report	6 Oct 2004 15:54
Member Since: May 2003 Posts: 9 750 Send Message	Tinkerbell....sexy???? Hehehe next thing people will be saying Barbie looks Butch !! Elaine x
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	Unknown	Report	6 Oct 2004 15:09
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	From the letters page: Who does Walt Disney think he's kidding? First, he explains away the sexy-looking figure of Tinkerbell in Peter Pan by saying he was making the character easy for Americans to understand. Secondly, he gives Glynis Johns some extremely low necklines in The Sword and the Rose and claims they were purely historical! Come off it Walt!!! From Mrs S.R. Sidebottom, Greenford, Middlesex who was awarded £2.2s for her letter The reply was this: You've got something there. But lets be fair to Disney, Tinkerbell HAD to be in character with the other American types in Peter Pan. And Walt Disney may well be right about the neckline you know. They wore them low in Tudor times