Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Little confused, can someone help?!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Karen | Report | 12 Feb 2008 11:55 |
Thanks Claire, will dfinitely order that certificate as I have a real suspicion that Ellen is the first child of George and Katherine, it fits in too well with her being pregnant when they married at 16 and 18, for no other apparent reason! |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 12 Feb 2008 09:52 |
As Ellen Barefield was born after the marriage, her birth cert should show the correct parents (no reason not to!). It is however possible that she was staying with her grandparents on the night of the census & been put down as child instead of grandchild. Only a cert will give you the answers, £7 from the GRO |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 12 Feb 2008 09:20 |
There is an Ellen Harriet Barefield registered in Q3 1893 - George and Catherine were married in Q4 1892. On the 1901 Census, Ellen Harriet is with David and Eliza Barefield, as their daughter. Would it be possible that they brought her up as their daughter, despite her being their grandchild, and if so, is Ellen's birth certificate likely to be accurate as naming the correct parents? |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 12 Feb 2008 08:41 |
Thanks Claire! Just seemed a bit strange that Eliza Seal had a rather large gap between children - although I suppose in the late 1800s you didn't really have much choice on becoming pregnant - if you were sexually active it was a risk you had to take! Katherine Barefield seemed to name her children after her brothers and sisters anyway, so I suppose that fits! Wonder if Katherine Barefield had a miscarriage/stillbirth after she got married... guess I'll never know that one! |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 12 Feb 2008 08:35 |
Davis Seal's birth |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 12 Feb 2008 07:49 |
I have found this family who I am pretty sure are Katherine's parents in 1901. Katherine and George also appear on the census with their children, but just wondering if David is really David and Eliza's child... or George and Katherine's. Or indeed if they both had a son called David, born within a couple of years of one another... am now looking for a birth entry for David and Eliza's David! |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 13 Jan 2008 22:33 |
Hi Karen, |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 13 Jan 2008 22:16 |
Kate with parents David and Eliza is listed in the 1881 census as having been born in Spitalfields, in 1891 Bethnal Green - so am thinking this one... |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 13 Jan 2008 21:40 |
In 1901, your Katherine has birthplace as Bethnal Green. |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 13 Jan 2008 21:37 |
Thanks Gwyn. I had found the marriage entry but was hoping to go further back on her side. Any ideas? I am fairly new to all this and so far have been tracing the family name, so at least I knew what name I was looking for! It's a bit harder with women isn't it?! |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 13 Jan 2008 21:33 |
Probable marriage...on freebmd site |
|||
|
Karen | Report | 13 Jan 2008 21:28 |
I am looking for my partners grandmother, Catherine Seal (b. c1876) before she married and changed her name to Barefield. SHe appears on the 1901 Census with her husband and 3 children in Hackney, London (although name spelt with a K). I am trying to track her in the 1881 and 1891 Census, but not sure how to check who she is. |