Clarrification on name John/Jonathan

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: January 2005 Posts: 68 Send Message	Maggie 'O the Mainland	Report	26 Dec 2007 01:54
Member Since: January 2005 Posts: 68 Send Message	Thanks Lindsey I thought they might all be interchangeable but thought I should get second opinion before I start jumping to too many conclusions. Maria
Member Since: August 2007 Posts: 13 276 Send Message	Lindsey*	Report	25 Dec 2007 11:34
	Jno jon and all variations seem acceptable, my Johns all called themselves Jack, it doesn't help!
	Researching: For better results please give all the details ,name, date place as you can {pictures by me }
Member Since: January 2005 Posts: 68 Send Message	Maggie 'O the Mainland	Report	25 Dec 2007 11:02
Member Since: January 2005 Posts: 68 Send Message	Can anyone tell me please, if the name John would have been short for Jonathan or if a Johnathan could be also named John. I know in modern times Jonathan can be known as Jon (no 'H') but I am trying to clarrify a name and relationship in 1839 without the benfits of a census to help me out. I have a Jonathan in East Dereham and a John in Castle Acre possibly the same man. Both were publicans around the same time. Cheers Maria