Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Did nurses have to be registered in the mid 1800's
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Mad Alice | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:27 |
If not, how would I find out? |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:36 |
Nope I dont believe they did - virtually anyone could call themselves a nurse at that time.The job only became professional in the early decades of the 1900s. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:37 |
I don't think they did. Have a look at this web page as it gives details of the start of registration for nurses:- |
|||
|
DevonViolet | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:37 |
As far as I am aware, a registered nurse is a more recent qualification. Your request interested me, being a nurse myself, having googled the first nurse registered was in 1902 and was from New Zealand. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:38 |
If you check on the history of nursing, apparently the roll didnt start to 1916: |
|||
|
Mad Alice | Report | 19 Dec 2007 22:42 |
I have been chasing an ancestor Susannah Rosebrook who was a nurse in the 1860s - 1880s |