Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 11:08 |
THANKYOU FOR ALL WHO HELPED Hi all, My Grandmother was born a Marsh and her father was also a Marsh- Sidney Marsh b1889 in Hove. His father was a George Marsh b1859 and my Grandmother confirmed that he came from Partridge Green which on census records is listed as Horsham with occupants stating that they were born in West Grinstead. I have worked my way back from 1901 to 1851 where I had trouble once I got to George's childhood and birth record. Something I saw a while ago prompted me to look the surname up as Mersh and so found the family in the 1861 and 1851 census records under that name. George's father is a Maurice, which has been mistranscribed as Morris and Morice and he detailed himself as being born in Billingshurst. According to FreeBMD, George and his siblings were born as Mersh.This is something my Grandmother was unaware of. The name was written down as Mersh up until the 1871 census where the name change occurs. According to IGI, the marriage record (1839) for Maurice and his wife Emily states that he was a Marsh and on FreeBMD Emily (Woolger) is listed but I think that the Marsh who is female should be him and has been mistranscribed. My question is- should I have the family down as Mersh or Marsh as it has now confused me. I haven't been able to locate them in 1841 either and I have yet to find a birth record for Mauriceso obviously can't get any further back. Thanks Krystyna
|
|
GlitterBaby
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 11:13 |
1851 is this the family?
Name: Morris Mersh Age: 36 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1815 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Emily Gender: Male Where born: Billingshurst, Sussex, England Civil Parish: West Grinstead County/Island: Sussex Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Horsham Sub-registration district: South Horsham ED, institution, or vessel: 1b Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 3 Household Members: Name Age Ellen Mersh 11 West Grinstead Emily Mersh 36 Emily Mersh 2 weeks Fanny Mersh 16 West Grinstead - looks more like 6 Jane Mersh 6 John Mersh 9 Morris Mersh 36
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 11:14 |
Hi, Yes that is correct. If you view the image it definitely says Mersh. Krystyna
|
|
GlitterBaby
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 11:16 |
1841 poss
Name: Ellen Mush Age: 2 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1839 Gender: Female Where born: Sussex, England Civil Parish: West Grinstead Hundred: West Grinstead County/Island: Sussex Country: England Street address:
Occupation: View Image Registration district: Horsham Sub-registration district: South Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Ellen Mush 2 Emily Mush 20 Moris Mush 25 Looks like Mersh on image
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 11:17 |
OMG!!!! Thankyou.The one variant I missed. But do you think they should be a Mersh or Marsh??Krystyna
|
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!)
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 12:47 |
I have this trouble with my Packham bunch who sometimes pop up as Peckham. I tend to use whichever name is prevalent at the time. If I have certificates saying Packham and one census return which says Peckham I leave them as Peckham. When I'm back into parish registers they do often show as Peckham more often than not so I use that name. It's a majority thing generally for me.
Jill
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 13:02 |
Thanks for your input Jill. Much appreciated.
Krystyna
|
|
MaryfromItaly
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 13:17 |
While you're looking at alternative spellings, I think this may be Ellen's birth:
Births Sep 1839 (>99%) Merth Ellen Horsham 7 338
The image definitely looks like Merth.
The other births all seem to be registered under Mersh.
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 13:38 |
Hi, Yes I must admit that I did have trouble finding her birth record. Out of all of them hers was the nly missing one. It was on IGI though. Thanks for your trouble. That's another mystery cleared up. Krystyna
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 17:51 |
Hi Krystyna,
Apologies for reopening your sorted thread - I had missed this thread and am just catching up now.
The name sounds slightly foreign to me (as did Mauriceso, until I realised it was two words, lol), and I thought other Mersh families may have come from abroad. This does not seem to be the case at all.
Looking at the earliest census to give precise origins, the 1851 England census has only 58 individuals surnamed Mersh (as listed on Ancestry). All are born in England.
It looks as if this might be a case of vowel shifts as families move around the country - the locals hear the name differently until the family settle in and start using the local accent. (I once, to my chagrin, asked a lady wanting directions what "the rices" were - she only wanted the racecourse!)
The 58 people are from several counties in 1851 - perhaps worth checking out whether any of these are separate families with the distinct surname Mersh, or whether they all end up being Marsh as time flows (either forwards or backwards).
All the best
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 18:20 |
Hi Ivy, You put a very interesting thought to it. I will certainly make some checks, although at the moment I still have to find a birth for my Maurice. There do seem to be some Mersh's in Billingshurst and that is all I have to go on at the moment so it might be painstaking. I have read on the trying to find board that there are some Mersh's from Surrey who were originally Marsh. There are quite a few variants for the name also. Thanks for your interest. Krystyna
|
|
MaryfromItaly
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 19:26 |
Billingshurst baptisms don't appear to be on the IGI site yet, but they have been filmed by the LDS, so you could order the microfilm from your local LDS centre.
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 19:52 |
Hi Mary, Krystyna,
Thanks for the updates. I see from the 1851 census that there is a John Mersh also born in Billingshurst, who may be a relation.
Mary, where was the info about filmed baptisms not yet on the IGI? I do seem to have quite a few relatives from parishes not on the IGI.
(Apologies, will not see the reply, am on my way home now).
All the best
|
|
MaryfromItaly
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 21:23 |
If you look at the LDS catalogue:
http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Library/FHLC/frameset_fhlc.asp
you can do a place search for the parish you're interested in. Click on "Church records" and look for parish baptism, burial and marriage registers.
You can find the address of your local LDS centre here:
http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Library/FHC/frameset_fhc.asp
Give them a ring and tell them what you're interested in - if they don't have the microfilm they'll order it for about £2, and you can then look at it on the microfilm reader at the centre and photocopy anything interesting.
Order the parish register for the period you want if it's been filmed, rather than the bishop's transcripts, which usually contain less information.
If you happen to be in the area where the baptism or whatever took place, you can go to the local Records Office instead of the LDS centre.
To check whether something's on the IGI you can look for the parish on the Hugh Wallis site:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hughwallis/
However, it hasn't been updated for a couple of years, so there may be parishes that are on the IGI which don't appear on the Wallis site.
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
17 Dec 2007 22:59 |
Hi Mary,
Thank you very much indeed for this. I have just had a happy time finding all the methodist chapel batch numbers in the Prescot district, just as you said, under the church records section - this'll keep me busy for a little while finding my Smiths!
Many thanks
|
|
Krystyna♥
|
Report
|
18 Dec 2007 09:29 |
Thankyou everyone for all your input. I will certainly look at the LDS and order the microfilm. That's the only way of confirming my suspicions as I do think that John Mersh might be Maurice's father. I also have a couple of people who might be siblings so hopefully I can now start to knock down my wall. Thanks again all. Best regards Krystyna x
|