Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
SUGGESTIONS PLEASE
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 21:46 |
Okay Jill |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:38 |
Don't assume they were married - even if they show as such on the census returns. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:25 |
I guess my only option is to get the birth certificates for their children who were born b4 the 1881 census. That would give me Elizabeth's change in surnames so I might be able to pin point it to a couple of years. Lot of money to spend tho |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:21 |
No don't know any other info as yet. Just got my gt gt grandmothers birth cert today which gave me Elizabeth's surname. If I remember rightly their ages differed on the 81,91 an 01 census so difficult to track birth year exactly. That's why I thought their marriage would be a good place to start so I could get father's names :( |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:15 |
I know they are both common names around Newcastle, but do you happen to have the fathers names from an earlier census? I saw one possible John Richardson in Islington on the 1871 but no occupation given so cannot x check that. |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:11 |
Hmm |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:06 |
GT, how can you be so sure they were married when they had Mary A? It was quite common to have children before getting married in those days. |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:02 |
Me again, No they were definately married when they had Mary A. |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 17:00 |
Hi everyone, |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:51 |
This them in 1881? |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:49 |
theres this one |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:46 |
Would this be them? It's from BVRI. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:42 |
Hi Shirley |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:40 |
you can check both names on FreeBMD |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
genes trance | Report | 19 Nov 2007 16:29 |
Can anyone suggest what I can do as I can't find a marriage. The marriage was between John Richardson and Elizabeth Armstrong. Both were born in Newcastle-upon-Tyne and their first child, Mary Ann, was born there too. |