Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

It`s true

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Heather

Heather Report 10 Nov 2007 17:11

I found even extracted ones with mistakes.

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 10 Nov 2007 16:35

Margaret,

Was so annoyed that I could have almost taken the IGI info as "gospel", that I did not look to see how they had been submitted.

Kathlyn

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 10 Nov 2007 16:30

Are those IGI records submitted ones or extracted? Makes quite a difference.
I still don't understand why they can label them IGI when they're submitted.
Margaret

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 10 Nov 2007 16:23

I have read many times on these boards to "Treat the IGI with caution"....Oh yes.....

I obtained a cd of the parish registers for Ramsey, Huntingdonshire and pulled off the dates that were relevant to me.

Whilst skimming around on the IGI site I decided to do a check and this is what I found:-


IGI
Thomas Dawson married Sarah Grounds, on 19th June 1786

Parish registers
give the date as 12th April 1786

*************************************
IGI
Elizabeth Rose married Fryer Richardson 8th April 1833...

Parish registers gave the groom as John Dawson on 8th April 1833. (It is the John Dawson I am interested in)


Kathlyn