Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
So Sad
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kate | Report | 2 Nov 2007 12:41 |
So true, Heather. I came across a couple related to my direct ancestor by marriage. The couple married in 1778 and had children every year between 1779 and 1791, except 1783 and 1787. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 2 Nov 2007 12:08 |
I cant understand how they coped at all - Ive got so many dying as infants in my tree and then another comes along a few months later and is given the same name. I guess the poor women were baby machines then - God knows how they managed to get over the death of one and then it happened again and again. Not to mention the number of poor women dying whilst giving birth. Horrifying. |
|||
|
Teddys Girl | Report | 2 Nov 2007 11:47 |
My 2 x great grandmother died having a little girl, and the baby was baptized the same day of her mothers funeral. So sad. |
|||
|
MarilynB | Report | 2 Nov 2007 11:19 |
My great grandfather had eleven children, at least five of them died before they were three, including twins who both died when they were one. My grandad was the last of the children and his mother died five days after having him. That was around 1900. His father died when he was 14 and he was then adopted. I feel so sorry for families in those days, it must have been so hard. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Cumbrian Caz~**~ | Report | 2 Nov 2007 11:00 |
Hi Marilyn, have pmd you, |
|||
|
Charlotte | Report | 2 Nov 2007 10:58 |
It must have been hard for the families. I read an article in one of the family tree mags about a family who had 14 children and 8 of those died either shortly after birth or as infants. |
|||
|
MarilynB | Report | 2 Nov 2007 09:26 |
Just been searching parish records at Kendal and found a daughter of one of my ancestors, born, baptised and buried all on the same day in 1770. Their next child was another daughter three years later and they called her Elizabeth after the one that died. It must have been so upsetting in those days with all the child deaths and diseases, dont know why she died or even if she was stillborn, but it is very sad. |
|||
Researching: |