Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage records
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Heather | Report | 29 Oct 2007 13:13 |
Always verify facts by buying the certificates or you could end up going back centuries on the wrong line. |
|||
|
SuperMum | Report | 29 Oct 2007 12:01 |
Thank you all so much for your time and help. I have looked on the igi starting from my step mums father and realised that iowas actually going down the wrong track. I am now going in the right direction. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 29 Oct 2007 11:08 |
Just went to find death of Mary, its not jumping out in right area. Possibly one of several in Ashton area, if thats the right one? |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 29 Oct 2007 11:06 |
Marriages Sep 1867 (>99%) |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 29 Oct 2007 11:01 |
Probably you need to look for a second marriage. The obvious gap on the 1871 is between Sussanah born 1863 and Thomas born 1869. |
|||
|
SuperMum | Report | 29 Oct 2007 10:59 |
Thank you all for your help, I have since found that George Stelfox middle name was Warrine, and have found him in 1871, 1881, 1901 census with his wife Jane. Giving George's birth abt 1834 and Jane's borth abt 1843. I also now have all their childrens names, however with the oldest child Mary Jane Stelfox being born in 1854, it would have meant that Jane would have been 11 when Mary Jane was born. So I am presuming that either Jane's birth was incorrect or Jane was not the maternal parent of Mary Jane or her immediate siblings, there were in actual fact 8 children all together. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 29 Oct 2007 10:26 |
Work backwards using the info you are sure of.......... |
|||
|
Sam | Report | 29 Oct 2007 09:37 |
There isn't a Jane on the same page: |
|||
|
SuperMum | Report | 29 Oct 2007 09:33 |
Is it possible for me to find out who someone married without purchasing a marriage certificate. My step mothers grandfather George Stelfox married I believe in 1851 4th qtr volume xx page 462 in Manchester. However I dont want to purchase this marriage certificate if it is not the right one, I think that he married a girl called Jane, unsure of sirname. |