Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
missing from 1891 census
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sue C | Report | 11 Oct 2007 19:41 |
Here they are in 1891 |
|||
|
imp | Report | 11 Oct 2007 19:14 |
The rest of the family come up as well, so I would say it is your family. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:47 |
Aline Metcalf comes up on Findmypast on the 1891 but not on Ancestry, I don't have a subscription to look at the full image unfortunately. |
|||
|
~Summer Scribe~ | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:40 |
Can't see them myself either. Some people are just not listed for whatever reason. I recently came across a whole village that wasn't listed. Not the case here I would say given that they're in Newcastle. But, there are all kinds of reasons people aren't. |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:31 |
Have tried the most obvious misspellings I can think of so far - Melcalf(e), Metcalf etc but no joy yet. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:27 |
I was wondering if mum had remarried to become a Metcalf and would therfore appear under a different name in earlier census - there is a big gap between William and George. But if you have found them in 1881 - then I guess thats not the case. |
|||
|
lady jane | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:17 |
Thanks for the info but i just wonder how they are not on the 1891 census as suggested it could have been unreadable or a missing sheet, the metcalfs seem to have lived in the ouseburn area of byker. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 11 Oct 2007 18:05 |
1901 for ref to help with the search |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 11 Oct 2007 17:56 |
They are probably just very badly mis-transcribed. |
|||
|
lady jane | Report | 11 Oct 2007 17:55 |
can anyone give me any ideas my great grand parents edward and mary metcalf and their children edward, allina and robert, seem to be missing from the 1891 census, edward born about 1852 and mary born 1857 and lived in newcastle upon tyne he was a striker in the shipyards, I have spent hours looking in the census but that is the only year that they were missing. has anyone any idea why this could have happened. |