Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1861-1871 - census lookup Scotland please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 17:11 |
Thanks Claire, yes he is the son of those you said, i have looked for a death but nothing there at the moment. thanks for your help |
|||
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 17:05 |
Yes Woody thats the one but George born in 1856 parents seem to dissapear after his birth and from 1861 he lives with relatives. Thanks |
|||
|
Woody's | Report | 5 Sep 2007 17:00 |
There's a George born in Sept 1856 to a George Cowie and Margaret Porteous - is that the one you're looking for? |
|||
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 16:54 |
Thanks Claire but i think thats the wrong one because when i looked up Johns parents name the Margaret had a different maiden name to the Son George that i'm looking for if that makes sense. |
|||
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 16:24 |
They had a son called George in 1856 but he was living with grandparents in 1861 and an aunty in 1881 but don't know what happened to his parents |
|||
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 16:22 |
Midlothian in Edingborough Thanks |
|||
|
Katherine | Report | 5 Sep 2007 16:18 |
do you know which part of scotland they were in? |
|||
|
♥♥♥Debbie♥♥♥ | Report | 5 Sep 2007 16:06 |
For George and Margaret Cowie married but not sure of there age. There is one with a son called John age 4 in 1861 but that is the wrong one can anyone else find any others. Thanks Debbie |