Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
quick question
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Phyllis | Report | 21 Aug 2007 15:50 |
Hi folks, Thanks for your imput, will make a good discussion with family. Phyllis |
|||
|
maryjane-sue | Report | 21 Aug 2007 15:16 |
With small villages and even towns, there was a limit to how many tradesman could be had - so if sons wanted to stay close to their family, they would possibly need to change their trade. But sometimes a son would want to take up a new trade but there was no one in the vicinity to train under - I have ancestors who moved one or more counties away to serve their apprentiship. |
|||
|
Phyllis | Report | 21 Aug 2007 14:25 |
Hi Christine, That is what I say, he was youngest son so would not have taken over any way, with his moving away 90% of his family followed him into engineering. Or would there have been a war about that time for rifle makers etc. Phyllis |
|||
|
Phyllis | Report | 21 Aug 2007 14:19 |
hi folk, Just a quick question to help settle a point of view, say if someone lived in the country and did not wish to follow family footsteps into thier trade, would they say move 200 miles + to do say an engineering trade, this was 1861 or there abouts. I think that they would other family members say no. Phyllis |