Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Need for birth cert on marriage ?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Patricia | Report | 4 Oct 2007 09:36 |
I appreciate everyone's replies, even if they are 4 years after the request, it shows what caring people you all are, and thanks to Selena for alerting me to the replies. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 3 Oct 2007 14:56 |
Oh! |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 3 Oct 2007 14:50 |
I just realised we are working on a thread that's 4 YEARS OLD! |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 3 Oct 2007 14:47 |
found another, not sure where wells is |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 3 Oct 2007 14:44 |
Is this one any good? |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 3 Oct 2007 14:15 |
Has anyone mentioned that birth registration was not compulsory until 1875? |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 3 Oct 2007 12:57 |
Hi |
|||
|
Pamela | Report | 6 Jun 2003 09:41 |
It is perfectly possible she lied about her age, I have gt grandparents whose (1883) marriage cert says they were both of full age, when in fact they were both only 18, and I have their birth certificates to prove it, clearly they didnt have to prove their ages to the registrar, (it was a registry office wedding by licence) |
|||
|
Patricia | Report | 5 Jun 2003 21:19 |
Suzanne & Beryl Thanks for looking,& the thoughts on alternative spellings, those male Raikes were red herrings. I have the birth certificates & they were actually born in Shepton Mallet with a different father. I found a lot of Reakes in Evercreech,but none of the right ages & names.Our spelling is so definite, my grandfather even had Raikes as his middle name, as have my uncle & some cousins. She was on the 1881 census but in her married name of Pitt.All I can think is that her birth was registered some time after the event, for whatever reason. I shall keep checking FreeBMD in the hope that she will turn up. thanks for your help Pat |
|||
|
Suzy | Report | 5 Jun 2003 20:58 |
Hi Pat I have had a good look, but could not find an Ann Raikes. What a pain in the neck, eh? I did, however, find four records for Raikes, all male and all born in Shepton Mallet. One in 1837, one in 1839 and twins in 1841. Could these be her brothers? I apologise if you already have this information. But if you think they could be related, it may be worth your while sending off for a copy of the birth certificate(s) anyway. One of my GGG Grandmothers was born abroad, so there is little chance of getting her birth certificate. So I sent off for her brother's instead (he was born in London), and it gave me their parents' names. I have all the reference numbers if you haven't got them. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. |
|||
|
Beryl | Report | 5 Jun 2003 20:10 |
Hi Pat, Have you searched under a possible different spelling of the name? My maiden name was Reeks originally from Dorset but there are strong links with Somerset. I have found the name spelt various ways - Raikes, Rakes, Reekes etc. and I have looked at the Evercreech info on Family Search etc. to try and find a possible link without success - my Grandfather was once listed as Rix! As far as I know although civil registration began in 1837 it wasn't until 1875 that the burden of responsibility to register a child's birth was legally binding on a parent. If I've got that wrong I'm sure someone will put me right! Good luck, Beryl. Co.Durham. |
|||
|
Patricia | Report | 5 Jun 2003 19:32 |
Suzanne Thanks for the offer, here is the challenge Born Ann Raikes in Evercreech, nr Shepton Mallett in Somerset. About 1839/40. Married in St George's Bristol, her father was George Raikes. I have searched FreeBMD, 1837online, Family Search., all to no avail. I went to Evercreech & spent a jolly afternoon among the tombstones, again with no success. My latest hunt on FreeBMD produced a Hannah Raikes of Shepton Mallett dying in 1840. Am awaiting her death certificate, if she died giving birth to Ann, registering the birth may have been overlooked. It would be marvellous to find her. Jim, I spoke to the Vicar at Evercreech & all the parish records are kept at Taunton now, that means a full day which I have not yet organised. Pat |
|||
|
Suzy | Report | 5 Jun 2003 18:55 |
Hi Pat Where have you looked? I'm sure if you give your Great Grandmother's details, one of us may be able to help find a record of her birth. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 5 Jun 2003 18:43 |
Civil Registration did not start until July 1837, and it did take a while before all was running properly. I suggest that, if you have an idea WHERE your ancestor was born, you may well find her in the Parish Registers for that Parish. In fact, Parish Registers continue to be a good source of information on Baptisms Marriages & Burials. Best of luck with your research, Jim, Gosport. |
|||
|
Patricia | Report | 5 Jun 2003 17:57 |
I have my great grandmother's marriage certificate from 1871 which shows her as a "spinster of full age". I found her on the 1901 Census aged 61. BUT I cannot find any record of the registration of her birth. Would she have needed her birth certificate when she got married, or is that a more recent requirement?. The wedding was in Church. I would appreciate any advice on this. thanks. Pat. Frome, Somerset |