Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

found on many other census's, but why not on 1881?

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

George

George Report 27 Oct 2003 20:14

I'd suggest you ask for a 1891 census lookup from someone on the board. George

nic87

nic87 Report 27 Oct 2003 20:07

thanks Andy, Im pretty certain that both Emma and Bertie died before 1901, as my grandpa has only ever mentioned 3 siblings of his father (Albert, Dot, Mab, Charles), Nicola

Andy

Andy Report 27 Oct 2003 19:55

Hi, I think it's fairly likely that Euanna L.EUDBERY is actually Emma Louise ENDERBY. I found this birth entry on FreeBMD, which seems to match: Births Dec 1880 ENDERBY Emma Louise Nottingham Vol: 7b Page: 305 I tried to look for a death entry for her and Bertie but couldn't find any, however not all entries for 1881-1891 are on there still and the years 1886-1888 don't have many entries at all currently.

nic87

nic87 Report 27 Oct 2003 18:20

my grandma told me that hephzibah had a set of twins that died from scarlet fever. so maybe 'euanna' was 1/2 of a set if twins, where one had already died, and bertie also died, so the next son that they had was named after him. Is this a good enough explanation for the strange transcript?!

Mark

Mark Report 27 Oct 2003 18:14

I would say it is the same family original census could have been difficult to read when being transcribed

nic87

nic87 Report 27 Oct 2003 18:07

this is weird, the family that Georgina found are similar to my 1901 family; Charles Enderby, 47, bn Downham, Norfolk, living in Nottingham, Tailor Hephzibah Enderby, 50, Cambridge Soham, Nottingham, her maiden name was FULLER! Albert (Bertie???) 16,Nottingham, Watch maker apprentice Mabel, 18, nottingham, pupil teacher, dorothy, 10 , nottingham, charles , 14, notts nttm, woollen drapers apprentice What do you make of this?!

nic87

nic87 Report 27 Oct 2003 18:00

the surname is Enderby, i must have had brain cramp, forgetting to add that!

George

George Report 27 Oct 2003 17:53

Here you are: Charles EUDBERY Head M Male 27 Downhen, Norfolk, England Tailor Etephzk EUDBERY Wife M Female 30 Cambridge, England Wife Of Tailor Bertie EUDBERY Son Male 2 Nottingham, England Euanna L. EUDBERY Daur Female 4 m Nottingham, England James FULLER Boarder U Male 22 Downham, Norfolk, England Whitesmith Mary FULLER Visitor U Female 24 Downham, Norfolk, England Domestic Servant -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Information: Dwelling 95 St Ann Well Rd Census Place Nottingham St Mary, Nottingham, England George

nic87

nic87 Report 27 Oct 2003 17:25

I've found branch of my family tree (Charles bn 1854 in Downham, his wife Hephzibah, and their kids Mabel, Dorothy, Albert, Charles) on the `1901 census, and someone kindly found them on the 1891 census. but i cannot find them on the 1881 census. Does anyone know why this is, and if im searching wrongly, correct me please??!!!