Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Hmmmm...
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 26 Oct 2004 21:35 |
|
Received a birth certificate today of a great aunt born March 1905 and her parents are recorded as if married yet they didn't marry until December of that year. I think she would have been legitimated by the parents wedding but they would still be lying on the birth certificate wouldn't they. Have other people found this when the parents married a bit late?! All their children were born in Lower Holloway but they gave an address in Clapton Park at their marriage when they married at Hackney Register Office - does anyone know if you needed to be resident in a district for long before you married in a register office? David |
|||