Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Chamley or Charnley?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Heather | Report | 28 Aug 2007 16:30 |
I dont think its a case of the names being inter-changeable but just as Christine said, the transcribers could easily mistake the written letter r and n as m. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 28 Aug 2007 16:00 |
my family were called CHARNLEY. if it helps |
|||
|
Christine in Herts | Report | 16 Jan 2005 20:41 |
They are certainly going to look extremely similar in lower-case script: rn & m are very close Christine |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 16 Jan 2005 19:42 |
Remember if you are looking for Chamley, to look at Charnley as well. The names seem fairly interchangeable as far as I can tell. |