Genealogy Chat

Thanks so much for all your help Tom, I think that Emily was probably at home in 1861 though and as the first child wasnt born until 1863, this may be a little early x

look at this: ----------------- Name: Emily Baker Year of Registration: 1856 Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec District: Hackney County: Greater London, London, Middlesex Volume: 1b Page: 482 (click to see others on page) this is the qtr. where the page is missing!! and the others on the page ----- View Record Emily Baker 1856 Oct-Nov-Dec Hackney Greater London, London, Middlesex View Record George Buckland 1856 Oct-Nov-Dec Hackney Greater London, London, Middlesex View Record Elizabeth Ann Litton 1856 Oct-Nov-Dec Hackney Greater London, London, Middlesex View Record Henry Reynolds 1856 Oct-Nov-Dec Hackney Greater London, London, Middlesex View Record Elizabeth Ann Sitton 1856 Oct-Nov-Dec Hackney Greater London, London, Middlesex (One mnore woman than man) - although Litton and Sitton might be the same. : -( Definateley a possibility, you could order it with reference checking.

Hi tom, thanks so much for trying to help, I will check that out, feel even more fed up now as have just helped someone else!!! I correct that, it has made me feel abit better actually!!

There are a couple of missing pages on ancestry (no Box's / Boxalls etc) Dec Qtr. 1856 - might be something to check out...

tom am intrigued..... The birth was registered by Emily Boxall, she couldn't write though as it says the mark of

may sound like an odd question, but... who registered the birth and if it was George, could he write?

Hi Tom, Have just found an Emily baker in 1861 census at home in lambeth says she was born in lambeth. dont know what good this is to us though x

do you have either of them in 1861?

Tom, so kind of you to go to this trouble for me, I have looked up that one on the IGI and George Boxall married Mary Monger x

this is a possible - there is one more man than woman so... View Record Elizabeth Backhurst 1862 Oct-Nov-Dec Guildford Surrey View Record George Boxall 1862 Oct-Nov-Dec Guildford Surrey View Record Thomas Chapman 1862 Oct-Nov-Dec Guildford Surrey View Record Mary Monger 1862 Oct-Nov-Dec Guildford Surrey View Record James Wain 1862 Oct-Nov-Dec (Not Looked Up - Only Worthwhile If Corrected) but no Emily Barkers married then.. :-(

yes Tom, thems my folks x

Hi Lizz, Unfortunately there are quite a few Emily Bakers born in Lambeth, and the year differs on the census' from 1839 to 1840! Very frustrating, especially as i found a marriage for a distant cousin today that she couldn't find, sixteen years after the birth of her first child. she couldn't believe it as the rellie had put that she was already married on the kids birth certs, she she gave up looking after the kids were born, but we all know these rellies tell lots of fibs to the registrars!!!! x

1871 for ref View Record Albert Boxall abt 1870 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth London View Record Emily Boxall abt 1839 Lambeth, Surrey, England Wife Lambeth London View Record George Boxall abt 1838 Childenfold, Surrey, England Head Lambeth London View Record George Boxall abt 1865 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth London View Record Henry Boxall abt 1863 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth London View Record Mary Ann Boxall abt 1867 Lambeth, Surrey, England Daughter Lambeth London

Hi Fuzzy I checked BMD and Ancestry, cross checked for 1855 through 1865 but no match with an Emily Baker and a George Boxall. Maggie

Hi netti Emily was born in lambeth in 1840 and George was born in 1838/40 in Surrey (area differs from census to census! but main one say chiddingfold) x all children born in Lambeth or the later ones battersea

Have you tried looking under her middle name. i found a emily jane baker born 1839 lambeth. lizz

where and when were George and Emily born (from later census)?

Hi Reg, there are so many george boxalls in the area and also emily bakers, it would be impossible to know which were my two!!

Were they single on 1861 census? Have you checked the Ancestry bmd records? Reg

Sure Elizabeth, I have one of their childrens birth certificates x