Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Any ideas what this would mean please ?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Ellen | Report | 10 Apr 2007 19:51 |
Thanks for all your help on this one, it has given me some thinking material. Ellen. |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 10 Apr 2007 19:22 |
But Settlement orders were defunct by 1851! OC |
|||
|
RutlandBelle | Report | 10 Apr 2007 18:36 |
This is from the Workhouse Site: Settlement The principle by which a person could only claim poor relief from the parish under which they were officially 'settled'. Anyone trying to claim relief without correct settlement qualifications could undergo forcible removal to their own parish. A child's settlement at birth was taken to be the same as that of its father. Illegitimate children were granted settlement in the place they were born. If a boy became apprenticed his parish of settlement became the place of his apprenticeship. At marriage, a woman took on the same settlement as her husband. Settlement could also be acquired by various means such as renting a property above a certain value, or being continuously employed employed in a job for a year and a day. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 10 Apr 2007 18:34 |
I see what you mean - it is placed quite carefully next to these two entries rather than being scrawled across the page. They are both lodgers - could it mean 'under settlement order'? Someone else may be more clued up about settlement orders than I am, to confirm/rule out. Here is the Ancestry extract for ref: 1851 England Census about Geroge Lockyer Name: Geroge Lockyer Age: 13 Estimated birth year: abt 1838 Relation: Lodger Gender: Male Where born: Christchurch, Hampshire, England Civil parish: Hampreston County/Island: Dorset Country: England Registration district: Wimborne Sub-registration district: Cranborne ED, institution, or vessel: 6a and 7a Household schedule number: 61 Household Members: Name Age Geroge Lockyer 13 Harriett Oxford 43 James Oxford 8 Mo John Oxford 68 William Oxford 2 John Sackyer 10 Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1854; Folio: 399; Page: 14; GSU roll: 221001. |
|||
|
Ellen | Report | 10 Apr 2007 17:33 |
Thanks Reg, But it definately is U S O not U S D and why only next to two people and no one else ? Ellen |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Apr 2007 17:28 |
It is probably USD..........Urban Sanitary District Reg |
|||
|
Ellen | Report | 10 Apr 2007 17:27 |
Hi, Would anyone know what U S O would stand for next to a name on a Census. The Census I've been looking at was on Dorset OPC'S for 1851 in the Parish of Hampreston, it only seems to be next to two entries for George and John Lockyer. Thanks Ellen. |