Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Missing on 1901 census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Christine2 | Report | 17 Apr 2007 10:06 |
|
Does it say what Ethel did for a living? p.s. I think you mean 1891 and 1893?? |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 16 Apr 2007 23:14 |
|
Well!!!!!!!!!! Marriage cert arrived today Ethel Maud Barton shows as being 21yrs old in 1912, this makes her dob as 1881 but i know she was born in 1883, she obviously lied for her wedding and added 2 yrs on her father is shown as James George Barton and they are shown to live in Pembrey i still cannot find any information for her on any of the 1901 census' or for her father James George Barton (dob unknown) anyone have any ideas? stephanie |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 14 Apr 2007 15:29 |
|
I have found a lot of problems with the Ancestry index for the 1901 census and have been unable to find several names. Try looking on the original , now the GR, 1901 census index as this has far less errors and omissions to see if you can find then on there. The underlying census pages are of course identical, but the two indices are totally different. You don't need credits to search. If something does come up then sometimes the search gives enough info on location etc to go back to Ancestry. |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:29 |
|
She will be found eventually, lol will wait for her marriage cert and try and gather information from that thanks for your help everyone stephanie |
|||
|
Christine2 | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:27 |
|
There isn't a brother Jack on that one though. |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:25 |
|
ignore last mesasge, just found it, will have to see what the marriage cert shows for an address |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:21 |
|
hi Jim how did you find Maud Barton Rose? |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:13 |
|
There's a John Everard Barton b. Mar qtr 1889 Droitwich reg dist (which covers Worcestershire and Herefordshire). |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:10 |
|
Dont think its the Bourton one, checked the image and its not mistranscribed stephanie |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:07 |
|
Believe she had a brother Jack born in 1890 so not sure if thats the one, i have ordered her marriage cert and will see what hte address shows on that thanks stephanie |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:07 |
|
Could she have gone by her second name? I found this one in 1901. 23 Bridge Street, Leominster, Herefordshire Rose Barton Wife M 27 no occ b. Leominster, Herefordshire Maud Barton Dau 8 b. Leominster, Herefordshire George Barton Son 6 b. Leominster, Herefordshire Sidney Barton Son 3 b. Leominster, Herefordshire |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 13 Apr 2007 20:06 |
|
Are her Parents Arthur and Annie? If so, goes under Bourton, unfortunately cannot give any further details as my sub has run out Linda |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 13 Apr 2007 19:55 |
|
i have Ethel Maud Barton born in Feb 1893 County: Herefordshire, Hereford and Worcester, who is lost on the 1901 census help someone? stephanie |
|||