Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
dissappears :s
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Stephanie | Report | 25 Apr 2007 20:32 |
John Twell had his birth registered in Hull 1862, and his marriage is registered, however... he isnt in the 1871, 1881 or 1891 census :s I dont understand. Steph |
|||
|
Georgina | Report | 25 Apr 2007 20:40 |
Steph who did he marry & when? Georgina. |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 25 Apr 2007 20:56 |
He married Jane Kay in the first quarter of 1895 this was Jane's second marriage, her maiden name was Hart. Steph |
|||
|
Ajwyorks | Report | 25 Apr 2007 21:14 |
Is this him in 1901?? Name: John Twell Age: 38 Estimated birth year: abt 1863 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Jane Gender: Male Where born: Burgh, Lincolnshire, England Civil parish: Sculcoates Ecclesiastical parish: Sculcoates St Mary County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Registration district: Sculcoates Sub-registration district: West Sculcoates ED, institution, or vessel: 15 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 182 Household Members: Name Age Dorrace Twell 4 George Twell 12 Herbert Twell 2 Jack Twell 10 months Jane Twell 32 Jane Twell 5 John Twell 38 Wallace Twell 10 Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 4493; Folio: 65; Page: 26. but he says he is born in Lincolnshire and not in Hull |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 25 Apr 2007 21:22 |
Yeah thats him, is there any record of him before that? Thanks Steph |
|||
|
Ajwyorks | Report | 25 Apr 2007 21:45 |
1891 possible He's a stoker Name: John Twell Age: 27 Estimated birth year: abt 1864 Relation: Member of Crew (Member) Gender: Male Where born: Lusding, Lincolnshire, England Civil parish: Royal Navy Town: Brompton County/Island: Kent Country: England Registration district: Medway Sub-registration district: Gillingham ED, institution, or vessel: Audacimi Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age John Twell 27 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 667; Folio 18; Page 6; GSU roll: 6095777. I've removed all the other members of the crew. Cannot see him in 1881 but if he was at sea he wouldn't show up |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 25 Apr 2007 21:49 |
Noticed on the 1901 census that sons George and Wallace must be from Jane's previous marriage to Kay. 1891 census 34 (Something?) Street, Holy Trinty, Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire Alfred Hart, head, 63, tailor Jane, wife, 59 William, son, 28, tailor Margaret, dau, 14, general domestic servant Henry, son, 14, port errand boy George Kay, son-in-law, 28, milkman Jane Kay, daughter-in-law, 23 William Borman, brother-in-law, 64, tailor George A. Kay, 3 months Plus a boarder. All born Hull. Evidently Jane should be daughter not daughter-in-law. No relationship given for baby George A. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 25 Apr 2007 21:54 |
Birth of George Arthur Kay, March quarter 1891, Hull. Also Wallace Mac Jain Kay, Dec. quarter 1893, York. ( Don't know about that one) Don't see a death of first husband George Kay. Update, just noticed a George William E. Twell, born 1889 and Wallace Twell, born 1891, both Sculcoates. Who did they belong to if John & Jane didn't marry till 1895? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 25 Apr 2007 22:17 |
Oops, I've got something wrong! On the 1901 census, Jane Kay, age 33, born Hull is a widow with her 10 year old son George A. I'd better quit! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stephanie | Report | 25 Apr 2007 23:48 |
Thank you thats brilliant and will explain why i might not have been able to find him on the 1881 census. Steph |