Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

finding volume and page

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

David

David Report 16 May 2007 16:21

having found the area and the approx time of a marriage how do i get to where it says volume number and page number to find the exact date if anyone could help

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 16 May 2007 16:28

If its between 1837 and about 1915, I look on the freebmd site http://freebmd.rootsweb.*com/cgi/search.pl Remove * Then I check the reference on Ancestry. Gwyn

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 16 May 2007 16:32

The volume and page numbers will not tell you the date. The only way to determine the exact date is to purchase the cert. You do, however, need the refs to order from the GRO. Reg

Belle Ringer

Belle Ringer Report 16 May 2007 16:36

Hi David, The freebmd site that Gwyn refers to has one advantage over Ancestry, which is that you can search on the bride AND groom's names at the same time. Very useful if the names are fairly common. :-) Chris

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 16 May 2007 16:40

freebmd only covers up to about 1915, and is not complete even for the years it covers.. Reg

Belle Ringer

Belle Ringer Report 16 May 2007 16:43

Very true, Reg, but I've completely transcribed all entries for one surname from 1837 to 1915, using freeBMD as a basis and checking each image as well. I would say that out of 3500 names, maybe 30 were missing from the transcribed index. So it's very nearly there, and it's much better than nothing at all. :-) Chris

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 16 May 2007 16:57

I rather think that David has found the entry, but is under the impression that he can get further info on line............which, of course, can't be done. Reg

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 17 May 2007 23:20

David???????