Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
What a find....but what is it?....ANSWERED THANK Y
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Lesley M | Report | 20 May 2007 17:42 |
I have been given a document which relates to my g-g-grandparents – an “acknowledgement of deeds by married women”, dated 1849. It’s in fantastic condition considering it’s over 150 years old, and fully legible. However, I have no idea what it’s all about. I’ve tried Google and others, and there’s lots of references to this type of document, but none of them actually explain what it is. Has anyone come across one of these before and can tell me why it would have been drawn up? Lesley |
|||
|
Joyce | Report | 20 May 2007 17:54 |
Hi , I think that it relates to property owned by the lady....probably inherited from her parents.. Husbands in those days , apart from acquiring a wife also got control and possession of her monies etc.... This acknowledgement of deeds would be in relation to selling her property by her husband...it prevented sale /disposal without her permission or knowledge.... Lucky you ... Joyce |
|||
|
Paul Barton, Special Agent | Report | 20 May 2007 18:02 |
Until the Married Women's Property Acts of 1870 and 1882, a woman's property became her husband's on marriage. Single and widowed women, however, could own property in their own right. To safeguard property for the benefit of a married woman, it was often put in the names of trustees, or was the subject of a marriage settlement deed. |
|||
|
Paul Barton, Special Agent | Report | 20 May 2007 18:06 |
These parchment certificates can sometimes be found attached to conveyances, or occasionally on their own, having become detached from the relevant deed. The earliest certificates date from 1833. They were brought in thanks to a clause in the Fines and Recoveries Act of that year. A married woman selling or mortgaging property jointly with her husband had to be interviewed separately by a public official to certify that she was 'of full age and competent understanding', to confirm that she was not being forced into agreeing to the sale. The background to this procedure was that any land or property owned by a woman became the property of her husband on their marriage. Therefore, if she had inherited a house from her parents, her husband could sell it. However, under common law she was required to be a party to the deed. The acknowledgments represented an attempt to prevent husbands from abusing their position as owners of property which had come to them through their wives. The Married Women's Property Act of 1882 gave married women the same rights over their own property as single or widowed women, and did away with the need for acknowledgments. In simple terms, the purpose was confirmation that a married woman was fully consenting to the sale of property. You can see an example on: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/mss/online/skills/deeds-depth/associated-acknowledgement.phtml Pl E12/6/18/8/14 - Certificate of the acknowledgment of a deed by Rebecca Coleman; 23 Sep. 1841 This example relates to an assignment of term of years and further mortgage of a close of land called The Acres in Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, belonging to Timothy Coleman, of the same date (Pl E12/6/18/8/13). The assignment has Rebecca Coleman's acknowledgment written onto it. This separate certificate is an examined copy, rather than an original. It was perhaps tucked into the deed, as there is no evidence of any pinning or sewing. Transcription: These are to Certify, that on the twenty third day of September in the Year One Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty one before us Richard Parsons and George Walkden Two of the perpetual Comissioners appointed for the County of Nottingham for taking the acknowledgments of Deeds by Married Women, pursuant to an Act passed in the Third and Fourth Years of the Reign of His late Majesty King William the Fourth, intituled, 'An Act for the Abolition of Fines and Recoveries, and for the Substitution of more simple modes of Assurance', appeared personally Rebecca the wife of Timothy Coleman and produced a certain Indenture marked A bearing date the twenty third day of September instant and made between the said Timothy Coleman and Rebecca his wife of the first part Hannah Sharpley of the second part William Thompson of the third part and Richard Wiliam Benn of the fourth part and acknowledged the same to be her Act and Deed And WE DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the said Rebecca Coleman was at the time of acknowledging the said deed of full age and competent understanding, and that she was examined by us apart from her Husband touching her knowledge of the contents of the said deed and that she freely and voluntarily consented to the same. Richd Parsons Geo. Walkden EXAMIN'D COPY, [Signature of Thos Sherwood] Clerk of the Enrolment of Certificates, &c. |
|||
|
Lesley M | Report | 20 May 2007 18:21 |
Thank you Joyce and Paul - I understand now. There is an attachment to the document which rambles on an awful lot, but eventually mentions the address of a property, which I guess must be the one that was being sold. Who needs Google when we have such a wealth of experts on here eh? Thanks again for your explanations. Lesley |