Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Can you tell me why.......
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deb needs a change | Report | 21 Jul 2007 13:28 |
|
Thanks Jill. So it's not just my lot that are thick....lol Deb:) |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 21 Jul 2007 13:25 |
|
Hi Deb I had the same thing happen on one of mine. After much puzzling and tracking what happened to her after the birth of her next child and widowhood etc I think she was just a bit thick. My answer was that her being a bit thick and possibly a new registrar in post meant that between the two of them they made a pig's ear of the registration! Cannot otherwise think of any possible reason why maiden name not given. I will keep tabs on this thread now in case anyone else has any ideas as it might be helpful. Jill |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Deb needs a change | Report | 21 Jul 2007 12:13 |
|
I've just received a birth cert and mother has no maiden name. She has the same last name as her husband though. I would have thought that if she shared the same last name, wouldn't it say, 'Smith, formerly Smith'? I have sent off for one of their other childrens cert just incase this one was incorrect. Could there be another explaination for this? Deb:) |
|||
|
Deb needs a change | Report | 21 Jul 2007 12:03 |
|
See below in a minute |
|||