Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ancestry images
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kense | Report | 4 Oct 2010 15:31 |
The ancestry.com message board has similar complaints for the US 1860 census. That has been happening since yesterday afternoon. The UK census for 1871 was definitely all right late yesterday though. |
|||
|
RutlandBelle | Report | 4 Oct 2010 15:14 |
Funny that as I had exactly the same problem with the 1871 just before lunch. I have reported it as 'wrong image'. Perhaps if enough people post the errors they will realise something is wrong. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:59 |
It has been going on since at least 10am. There is mention of it on the Ancestry Facebook messages. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:47 |
I wonder if it is a more "general" problem with the 1871 and not just with this record. I am getting the same thing with John Medcraft b1934 Dunstable - William Medcraft's record is coming up and his image if I go to it from the record but the correct image is coming up if I go straight to it. |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:29 |
It would be a very long task as it is many more than one page and would Ancestry understand from that process , that you only get the correct image by bypassing the transcription? |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:26 |
Yes, the transcriptions are all out but the images are correct. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:23 |
you can report the wrong image by clicking on the Report Image Problem on the left hand side of the transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:22 |
As Moody Blue says you get the right image by not opening the transcription first |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:19 |
all the Bowman seem to out . I clicked on Mary Jane Bowman niece and got an Ernest Bowman instead |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:15 |
I click on "view record" Emily Bowman parents Wm & Jane and the information I get is |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:13 |
I think you can report image problems on a link on the side where it says report trancsription errors. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
~~ Jules in Wiltshire~~ | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:10 |
Have just clicked on image and Emily is there with her parents William and Jane and brother Tom... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Moody Blue | Report | 4 Oct 2010 14:05 |
I really dont think it's me but could somebody please check these records & images on Ancestry 1871 census. Starts Emily Bowman b 1865 Yorkshire daughter Wm & Jane. When you click on" view record," this one pops up:- |