Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Woolwich
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Helen in Kent | Report | 24 Jul 2009 14:27 |
Does anyone know whether or not a baby born in September 1868 in Rochester, Kent, according to the census, could have been registered at Woolwich? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 24 Jul 2009 14:30 |
Rochester births should be MEDWAY registration district |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 24 Jul 2009 14:33 |
Woolwich is now a SE london suburb and is about 24 miles from Rochester so a Rochester birth wouldn't be reg in Woolwich it would be Medway Reg district |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 24 Jul 2009 15:01 |
Definitely not. Course, the census could be wrong. |
|||
|
Helen in Kent | Report | 24 Jul 2009 19:54 |
Hi. I always thought it should be Medway. However, as the Father worked with the navy as a tailor I just wondered.....the census is definitely right. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 25 Jul 2009 02:47 |
Perhaps the mother went to have her baby in Woolwich if her husband was away |
|||
|
Helen in Kent | Report | 25 Jul 2009 12:56 |
That's another thought, thank-you. |
|||
Researching: |