Finding a birth

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 26 223 Send Message	Gwyn in Kent	Report	29 Mar 2008 17:34
	With a given father's name and occupation at their marriage, you may be able to find the family in 1841. Gwyn
Member Since: June 2003 Posts: 9 985 Send Message	Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!)	Report	29 Mar 2008 17:34
	It's likely they were christened - or should I say baptised. The worst thing is that I've read somewhere about parents who took their children to be baptised but could not afford to pay the fee (for the baptism certificate?) and therefore left before the cert was completed. In that case the entry may not have been made in the parish register as I think they were completed after the event. However, that probably happened in only a very few cases and probably only in larger towns. Chances are there is a record somewhere of the baptism of the child you are looking for.
	Researching: London: Faber, Haysey, Spicer ...
Member Since: April 2003 Posts: 5 733 Send Message	Sidami	Report	29 Mar 2008 17:29
	If a baby was born before 1837 and you didnt have to register them how do we find them, if they didnt get christened please? Sue
	Researching: Ringrose from Countesthorpe Lord and Burley from Countesthorpe...Dixon Dawson Wood and Wilkinson from Caistor ,Starkey and Wood from Edendam. Hare from Horncastle.