Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1901 look up please Maud Beardsley
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Creeky | Report | 18 Dec 2013 19:50 |
Can't find on Ancestry but seems to come up on others. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:16 |
If this is her in 1891 (hard to know without any other details): |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Creeky | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:21 |
Many thanks that's the one think Ancestry had her listed as born 1872. |
|||
|
Creeky | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:25 |
Have now found original and her age 29 has been changed to 19 bit of a blur, but all now fits into place. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:25 |
In the 1901 image, her age could be either 29, changed to 19, or vice versa. The figures have definitely been changed, so different transcribers might see it in different ways. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Creeky | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:42 |
Problem solved she was indeed 19 in 1901, married the same year and off to the USA. |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 18 Dec 2013 20:44 |
Name: Maud Beardsley |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 18 Dec 2013 21:06 |
You've obviously got this, but just for our interest (well, mine!): |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 19 Dec 2013 07:44 |
1910 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/MG7Y-CLT |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 19 Dec 2013 08:16 |
This could explain why little Frederick was not on board with them ? |
|||
|
Creeky | Report | 19 Dec 2013 10:16 |
Many many thanks to all who added the additional information, after I closed last night. Most interesting as I did not have it all. |