Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
James Viney/Sarah Wise Marriage
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 16 Dec 2013 23:29 |
Good point Amanda. But also worth bearing in mind that sometimes banns were read but they never went through with the marriage (I've just found one of those last week). |
|||
|
Amanda, | Report | 16 Dec 2013 22:21 |
Hi Brian, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 16 Dec 2013 21:41 |
That's the way it seems Brian. Still don't see her in 1851 as she is listed with her family. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 16 Dec 2013 21:28 |
I think I am making progress. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 16 Dec 2013 20:16 |
Always possible Reggie. In this instance though she seems to be with only one husband from the 18441 census through to the 1891. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Dec 2013 13:23 |
Exactly...a probable assumption - which is the point I was trying to get across. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 16 Dec 2013 12:12 |
Presumably an assumption from the 1891 census where mother-in-law Sarah Wise is living with Thomas and Sarah. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Dec 2013 11:44 |
You still haven't said how your friend knows Sarah's maiden name............. |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 15 Dec 2013 23:12 |
That would agree to the 1851 census: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:52 |
Could this be him? |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:50 |
Sorry, my mistake. It is JAMES, not Joseph. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:50 |
The death referred to appears also to be JAMES not Joseph: |
|||
|
BrianW | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:48 |
That seems to be the family. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:47 |
Here's William's baptism: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:43 |
The children's baptisms on FamilySearch give the father's name as JAMES Thomas Viney, not Joseph. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:39 |
As there were no penalties until 1875 for not registering births, the odds are that this man's wasn't |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:38 |
Isn't Sarah Harriet's father Thomas?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:38 |
1881 census |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:36 |
1871 census |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 15 Dec 2013 22:36 |
1911 census |