Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Parish Baptism Records

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

lilliesnan

lilliesnan Report 7 Oct 2013 15:38

Thank you mgnv........I will do that.

mgnv

mgnv Report 7 Oct 2013 12:05

Susan - the collection "England, Norfolk Parish Registers, 1538-1900" is partly indexed, so do a search on there first before you take the "Browse through 293,422 images" link. It's much easier if it's indexed - there'll be an image link in the right column.

You can see this at this hit (for John Smith):
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/VNN6-MTL

lilliesnan

lilliesnan Report 7 Oct 2013 11:53

Thank you all so much for your help and advice.

Didn't know how to find original documents on family search...........now I can check the others I have found as well - an added bonus thanks to you wonderful people.

Susan :-D


mgnv

mgnv Report 7 Oct 2013 01:01

There are, in fact, 4 lines that differ, not 3:
Church St Mary At
RegisterNumber
Notes
FileNumber 16999

and
Church St Mary
RegisterNumber 41
Notes Paupers
FileNumber 17235


The church made its own backup copies of parish registers - in most districts these were the Bishop's Transcripts (BTs), but in Norfolk, one often comes across Archdeacon's Transcripts (ATs).
The BTs/ATs are supposed to be identical copies of the originals, although sometimes errors were corrected.


For images, go to:
https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list#page=1®ion=UNITED_KINGDOM_IRELAND
Then browse down the following paths:
England, Norfolk Parish Registers, 1538-1900 > Beeston next Mileham > Baptisms > 1783-1803 > Image 33 of 36
England, Norfolk Archdeac...'s Transcripts, 1600-1812 > Norfolk > Beeston > 1600-1812 > Baptisms, Marriages, Burials > Image 138 of 188

Chris in Sussex

Chris in Sussex Report 6 Oct 2013 21:22

Is it one of the Parishes that has images for the registers available on Family Search?
http://tinyurl.com/pqzc7ma
If so then it would be well worth having a look to see if there is any information not transcribed.

Maybe the first entry was for a private baptism and the second made when the child was received into the Church.

Chris

Christine

Christine Report 6 Oct 2013 20:42

Hi Susan

It may be that the register entry has been transcribed twice, but the second person who did it was more thorough!

Marked As Answer Marked as Answered

lilliesnan

lilliesnan Report 6 Oct 2013 18:28

This may seem an odd question but I am hoping some kind person may have an explanation.....

While checking Norfolk baptism, marriage and burial records on FreeReg for my Bridges ancestors I found 2 baptism records for HENRY BRIDGES in 1792.

The parents, date of birth, date of baptism and church are the same on both BUT one record gives a file number of 16999 and no register number.........the second record gives a file number of 17235 and a register number of 41. It also states NOTES: PAUPERS.

Why would there be 2 records for one baptism?

Susan