Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Robert Scott 1884 - 1953
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
stephen | Report | 23 Dec 2013 11:25 |
In the end we opted for the 1883 birth certificate and that proved to be the right one but, as we suspected, there is no father named on it. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Jul 2013 16:14 |
Let's hope it helps but, as you say, it will probably not have the father's name. |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 27 Jul 2013 16:09 |
I've opted for the 1884 cert because he was 22 years old when married in 1907 and 69 when he died in 1953 |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Jul 2013 16:03 |
Which birth cert have you sent for? There are two possibles: |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 27 Jul 2013 15:59 |
Potty, |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Jul 2013 14:55 |
Josephine married Jesse under the name of Scott - that would seem to indicate that Robert and John were probably both illegitimate. Do you have their marriage cert? |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 26 Jul 2013 19:05 |
We now have more evidence of Robert Scott’s identity. He was born in Brighton in 1884 to Josephine Scott (her maiden name) and had a brother John Scott some three years younger. The family is shown on the 1891 census living at 14 Fleet Street, Brighton. |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 15 Jul 2013 12:06 |
From other relatives, it now seems fairly certain he came from the Portsmouth area as he had a brother still living there, possibly in the 1960s. |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 9 Jul 2013 09:23 |
Can anyone suggest another route we might be able to find more about him? |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 8 Jul 2013 13:45 |
To sum up so far, I think we can reasonably discount Robert Harold Scott as he just doesn't seem to fit. Though all we really have is his father's name as William and the possibility of his mother or other relative being named Matilda. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jul 2013 13:15 |
Odd, as the Robert H I posted was in the 1891 and is still alive in 1901, living with his widowed mother Emily, so can't be the one who died in 1886 but I can't find a birth for him. |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 8 Jul 2013 13:10 |
Mother Rose, Little Rose and Matilda all appear in the 1911 census living at 40 Cumberland Street. No mention of Robert as he was probably at sea on that date |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 8 Jul 2013 13:03 |
Yes, Matilda died after only a few months |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 8 Jul 2013 13:02 |
The husband/father is not on 1911 census............as per original message |
|||
|
safc | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:57 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:52 |
The tree on Ancestry is a work of fiction |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:51 |
I think he died Potty if you note my edit above. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:47 |
Looks like the Robert in that tree had a father Thomas: |
|||
|
stephen | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:46 |
I think the Ancestry tree mistakenly refers to another Robert Scott who died a few months earlier. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 8 Jul 2013 12:46 |
Ancestry trees are notoriously unreliable |