Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ruth Wheatley
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Joanne | Report | 7 May 2014 20:40 |
Hi again its also got Ruth on the census could she be step daughter to head of family James Bunting they lived on openwoodgate. regards jo-anne |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 7 May 2014 20:38 |
Hi Ann wheatley was married to my great great grandad James Bunting could it be that she had been married before to a wheatley as on a family tree I have it says wheatley nee Beardmore hope this helps jo-anne |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 7 May 2014 20:38 |
Hi Ann wheatley was married to my great great grandad James Bunting could it be that she had been married before to a wheatley as on a family tree I have it says wheatley nee Beardmore hope this helps jo-anne |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:19 |
???? |
|||
|
James | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:18 |
Mary |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:16 |
Right Ozi I see it now,but I think he has a tree with her ancestors going way back to William Wheatley 1772 and Samson Beardsmore 1780. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:16 |
Mike, in-law was the term used for step children at the time. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:13 |
Described as daughter in law in 1871 but unmarried ????????? |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:10 |
Mary, see my post. Her age has been mistranscribed. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:10 |
|
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:08 |
Looks like one of them has a page number error. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:07 |
James,where do you have her in 1871. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:04 |
|
|||
|
James | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:04 |
Thankyou all very much for your help and yes Mike she was born at |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 20:00 |
1861 England Census |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 27 Jan 2011 19:58 |
1861 |
|||
|
James | Report | 27 Jan 2011 19:57 |
Thanks for that Porkie Pie but it is definately Wheatley |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 27 Jan 2011 19:56 |
Ruth Ann Wheatley |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 27 Jan 2011 19:56 |
1871 England Census |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 27 Jan 2011 19:55 |
Is she Ruth Ann ? |